Blasphemy vs free speech

~Deny science.
Scientists will ask for evidence of your denial.
~Deny a political party.
No harm done. Simply vote the way you choose to vote.
~Deny religion.
Some will wag a finger. Some will yell. Some will hurt you. And some want to make blasphemy laws preventing you from denying any religion in the hopes of protecting their own.

Of all the things that could be unlawful to deny, religion should be at the bottom of the list because it is nothing more than an unprovable belief.
Denial of anything is free speech and should be an untouchable right.

Blasphemy laws are an attempt to legislate faith to be more valuable than truth.

Its unproven nature... its vulnerability to defend itself is the true reason religions scream for blasphemy laws.
Blasphemy laws are against humanity and against the natural order of survivability.
If the only way your religion can survive is to keep the majority of people who don't believe it from criticising it, then maybe it's time your religion took its natural place in mythology.

Religions want to imprison those who freely speak non religious beliefs.

The strictly religious idea of blasphemy is a crime against reason and knowledge and must be denied by all people who put the survival and advancement of humanity before antiquated superstitions.